"People who care nothing for the past usually have no thought for the future and are selfish in the way they use the present. When there is proper regard for the past and its people, we enrich the present. I have managed to fill 78 volumes which are my personal journal. There have been times when I have been so tired at the end of the day that the effort could hardly be managed, but I am so grateful that I have not let slip away from me and my posterity those things which needed to be recorded." Spencer W. Kimball--Church News August 16, 1980 p6
I don't know what the answer is, but I find myself defending each record-keeping approach. The things I write in my journal are personal, so personal that I would never write them in a blog. It's where I record some of my most tender spiritual experiences and my greatest frustrations. It would cheapen it to record all of that in a blog. My family scrapbooks are priceless--really! I wouldn't trade anything for them. If my house was burning down I would grab them first after my children. A picture is worth a thousand words, and these pictures speak volumes. My blog is how I keep in touch with extended family and friends. It's a social way of talking about my life. But it also keeps a history of events that aren't recorded anywhere else. And most importantly...it's a place to store my pictures. If my house did burn down, I would have pictures still because they're on my blog. (do you think I'm obsessed with my house burning down?) We don't take family movies and I have a constant ulcer about it. My kids are growing up! There's no other way to record the little physical idiosyncracies my children have. Still photos and journaling can't do it justice like movies can. But these things take up a lot of time! Am I wasting so much time recording history that I'm failing to actually live anything worth recording?
What do you do?












.jpg)

.jpg)




.jpg)


.jpg)



